Home Podcasts The Dionysius Circle Podcast
The Dionysius Circle Podcast

The Dionysius Circle Podcast

Samuel Walker Bennett 21 Episodes Sep 19, 2026

The Dionysius Circle Podcast focuses on Christian Platonism and the broader Platonic tradition. It examines the integration of Platonism within Christian philosophy and theology, along with Plato himself and later schools of Platonism. The podcast also explores how Platonism developed in Jewish and Islamic thought. Additionally, it maintains an ongoing interest in philosophical Platonism, both ancient and contemporary.

Episodes

Kevin Clarke on St. Maximus the Confessor: One Christ, Two Wills
Kevin Clarke on St. Maximus the Confessor: One Christ, Two Wills Sep 19, 2026 5301 Kevin Clarke of Sacred Heart Seminary joins Sam Bennett and Dominic Cassella to discuss St. Maximus the Confessor’s Opuscula and Dispute with Pyrrhus. Clarke’s new translation and introduction is available here: https://www.amazon.com/Opuscula-Dispute-Pyrrhus-Theological-Polemical/dp/0813240824We talk about why Maximus defended two wills and two activities in Christ, why his opponents thought this
Max Rohstock on Dionysius and the Origin of Evil
Max Rohstock on Dionysius and the Origin of Evil Sep 7, 2026 4189 Max Rohstock argues that, for Dionysius, evil arises when human freedom turns away from the Good itself and becomes fixed on finite goods (wealth, power, pleasure) as though they were ultimate. Yet the Good never ceases to sustain us or call us back. In that sense, even our return to the Good begins from a grace that is already present.
Andreas Bergman: Why Baptism Is Necessary in St. Maximus the Confessor
Andreas Bergman: Why Baptism Is Necessary in St. Maximus the Confessor Sep 3, 2026 4166 In this episode, we talk about a puzzle in St. Maximus the Confessor. First, Maximus holds that every human being already participates in Christ: Christ is the source, ordering principle, and final end of human nature. Second, Maximus says that the virtues are, in some sense, natural to us, and that the virtues lead to deification So why do we need baptism at all? Why does Maximus hold that baptis
Mark Blitz on Aristotle's Political Philosophy
Mark Blitz on Aristotle's Political Philosophy Jul 9, 2026 4095 Political philosopher Mark Blitz joins the podcast to discuss his new book, Aristotle’s Political Philosophy. We consider Aristotle’s account of the link between political life and human happiness, the regime as a way of life, the place of virtue in liberal democracy, and the tensions between politics, philosophy, and religion. Patrick Jones joins me for the conversation.
The Function Argument in Aristotle's Ethics with Jakub Jirsa
The Function Argument in Aristotle's Ethics with Jakub Jirsa Jul 9, 2026 4195 In this episode, Sam Bennett speaks with philosopher Jakub Jirsa about his new Bloomsbury book, The Function Argument in Aristotle’s Ethics. They discuss Aristotle’s famous function argument, what it means to ask whether human beings have a distinctive function, and how this question shapes Aristotle’s account of virtue, happiness, and the human good.
Aristotle's Argument Against Plato's Form of the Good - with Michele Pecorari
Aristotle's Argument Against Plato's Form of the Good - with Michele Pecorari May 30, 2026 5290 In this episode, I speak with Michele Pecorari about one of Aristotle’s arguments against Plato’s Form of the Good in Nicomachean Ethics 1.6. Aristotle notes that we call many different kinds of things good: God is good, as a substance; virtue is good, as a quality; the right amount is good, as a quantity; and the right time is good, as a time. We discuss why Aristotle thinks this creates a proble
Gyula Klima on Ockham, Nominalism, and the Via Moderna
Gyula Klima on Ockham, Nominalism, and the Via Moderna May 23, 2026 5224 Gyula Klima discusses the medieval problem of universals, focusing on the divide between the via antiqua and the via moderna. The conversation centers especially on William of Ockham’s break with the older realist tradition, drawing on Klima’s article “What is Wrong with Nominalism?” (Divinitas, 2, 2025). Klima argues that the deepest shift is not simply metaphysical, but semantic: a new account o
Karsten Harries on Nicholas of Cusa, Modernity, and Nihilism
Karsten Harries on Nicholas of Cusa, Modernity, and Nihilism May 12, 2026 4373 Karsten Harries, emeritus Yale professor of philosophy, joins Dr. Sam Bennett for a conversation on Nicholas of Cusa’s On Learned Ignorance, the limits of reason, modern science, nihilism, Kant, Heidegger, beauty, and transcendence in human life.
How Do We Know Essences? Aristotle's Answer with Christopher Hauser
How Do We Know Essences? Aristotle's Answer with Christopher Hauser Apr 17, 2026 4283 In this episode, philosopher Christopher Hauser of the University of Scranton joins Dr. Sam Bennett to discuss Aristotle’s epistemology, specifically his theory of essence and how we come to know essences. We begin by clarifying what Aristotle means by essence, including the distinction between individuals and kinds, and between essential features and merely necessary properties. The conversation
Piero Boitani on the Timaeus, Beauty, and Poetic Thought
Piero Boitani on the Timaeus, Beauty, and Poetic Thought Mar 24, 2026 4474 In this episode, Dr Sam Bennett speaks with the Italian literary critic and poet Piero Boitani about his recent book Timaeus in Paradise: Metaphors and Beauty from Plato to Dante and Beyond, alongside his long poetic work Plato’s Poem. We begin with the remarkable story behind these works, including the unexpected emergence of poetic inspiration late in Piero's life. From there, the conversation t
Plato vs. Aristotle: A Fundamental Divide? With Dr. Rares Marinescu
Plato vs. Aristotle: A Fundamental Divide? With Dr. Rares Marinescu Feb 28, 2026 4206 In this episode, Sam Bennett speaks with Dr. Rareș Ilie Marinescu about the depth of the disagreement between Plato and Aristotle. Rareș is a Postdoctoral Fellow in Classics at the University of Toronto and the author of Proclus on Aristotle on Plato: A Case Study on Motion. Do Plato and Aristotle merely disagree at the surface level, or do they diverge at the level of first principles? Is motion
Against Aristotelian Universals: Two Arguments from Damiano Costa
Against Aristotelian Universals: Two Arguments from Damiano Costa Jan 14, 2026 4048 This episode is a discussion with philosopher Damiano Costa about his paper “An Argument Against Aristotelian Universals.” Costa examines the Aristotelian view that universals really exist, yet depend for their existence on being exemplified by particular things, and he explains why he thinks this position cannot be sustained.The discussion focuses on two arguments against Aristotelian universals.

Recommended