Home Podcasts Whiskey & International Relations Theory
Whiskey & International Relations Theory

Whiskey & International Relations Theory

Drs. Patrick Thaddeus Jackson & Daniel Nexon 34 Episodes Jul 20, 2026

Patrick Thaddeus Jackson and Daniel Nexon, both international relations scholars, discuss important works in international relations theory. Each episode focuses on a particular scholarly book or article and unpacks its arguments in a conversational way. The hosts add a relaxed, informal tone by drinking whiskey while they talk, making academic theory more approachable.

Episodes

Episode 1: Gates of the West
Episode 1: Gates of the West Jul 20, 2026 5792 We're baaack!In the inaugural episode of the second season of Whiskey and International Relations Theory, PTJ and Dan discuss Samuel Huntington's (in)famous 1996 book, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. This episode's pairing: Glen Scotia Double Cask whisky. Other works mentioned include: Patrick Thaddeus Jackson, Facts and Explanations in International Studies...
Episode 33: Status? You Just Met Us!
Episode 33: Status? You Just Met Us! Oct 15, 2023 4507 [audio updated to fix a mixing error]The second installment of our live taping at the British International Studies Association annual convention in Glasgow is a "Whisky Optional" roundtable on status and international-relations theory. Our guests are: Ali Bilgic of Loughborough University, Michelle Murray of Bard College, Rohan Mukherjee of the London School of Economics, and Steven Ward
Episode 32: Social Forces, States, and Clydeside Whisky
Episode 32: Social Forces, States, and Clydeside Whisky Aug 18, 2023 4608 Robert Cox's landmark article, "Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory," appeared in the journal Millennium in 1981. Among other things, it introduced the distinction between "critical" and "problem-solving" theory to international-relations scholars. But this isn't just any old episode where Patrick and Dan ramble their way through some decades-old
Episode 31: Great Balls of Power
Episode 31: Great Balls of Power Jul 17, 2023 7018 Back in 2019, Uri Friedman wrote that we "find ourselves—as you will have heard in the corridors of power and conference rooms of think tanks, and read in the government’s strategy documents and the media’s coverage of international relations—in an era of “great-power competition." "As Friedman noted, "great-power competition" has even" achieved hallowed acronym status—GPC..." It's been n
Episode 30: A Long, Strange Trek
Episode 30: A Long, Strange Trek May 18, 2023 5155 It's our first "actual" installment of Whiskey & IR Theory in Space! We discuss Star Trek: The Next Generation's 'gay rights' episode, "The Outcast," which Dan uses to introduce his students to different modes of "reading" the politics of (and in) science fiction. PTJ and Dan summarize the episode (can you spoil an 30+ year-old TV show?), discuss their own reactions to it, and then Da
Episode 29: Introducing: Whiskey & IR Theory... in Space!
Episode 29: Introducing: Whiskey & IR Theory... in Space! Apr 21, 2023 3050 Patrick and Dan talk about the newest feature of the podcast: a series in which they combine their long-running seminars on (international) politics and science fiction.In each episode of "Whiskey & IR Theory... in Space!" Patrick and Dan will discuss a book, television episode, or film that they've assigned in classes past. Here, though, they introduce the series by talking about the
Episode 28: Are We Living in a Simulation... of Sovereignty?
Episode 28: Are We Living in a Simulation... of Sovereignty? Mar 11, 2023 9527 PTJ and Dan discuss Cynthia Weber's 1994 book, Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange. Weber examines "the justifications for intervention offered by the Concert of Europe, President Wilson's administration, and the Reagan-Bush administrations" and analyzes them via a combination of "critical international relations theory and foreign policy analysis." Topic
Episode 27: Everything is Relational
Episode 27: Everything is Relational Jan 29, 2023 7044 It's a nostalgia episode for our two hosts, Patrick and Dan.They tackle Mustafa Emirbayer's 1997 article in the American Journal of Sociology, "Manifesto for a Relational Sociology." According to Emirbayer, "Sociologists today are faced with a fundamental dilemma: whether to conceive of the social world as consisting primarily in substances or processes, in static 'things' or in dynamic,
Episode 26: Anarchy vs. The Anarchy
Episode 26: Anarchy vs. The Anarchy Oct 11, 2022 5517 The University of Chicago's Paul Poast claims that G. Lowes Dickinson was the OG "modern" theorist of international relations—and also an "offensive realists." John Mearsheimer invokes Dickinson in Tragedy of Great Power Politics, but notes that Dickinson vocally supported the creation of the League of Nations. Brian Schmidt pays close attention to Dickinson in his work on the history of
Episode 25: The New Hierarchy Studies
Episode 25: The New Hierarchy Studies Aug 9, 2022 5204 Scholars of international relations don't agree on much, but they at least agree that anarchy (the lack of a common authority to make and enforce rules) is the defining feature of international politics, right? Not exactly. There's a long history of research that emphasizes the hierarchical character of international relations. Now a new wave of scholarship argues that international-relat
Episode 24: International Relations in China
Episode 24: International Relations in China Jun 20, 2022 5526 What is the topography of international-relations theory in the People's Republic of China? What is the "Chinese School of International Relations?" Astrid Nordin (King's College, London), Yan Xuetong (Tsinghua University), and Qin Yaqing (Peking University) join the podcast to answer these – and other – questions about Chinese international-relations scholarship. 
Episode 23: Being Academic and Pandemic Time
Episode 23: Being Academic and Pandemic Time Apr 19, 2022 5638 In this “Whiskey Optional” episode, PTJ facilitates a conversation among four colleagues from different countries and different kinds of academic institutions about the current global pandemic – not primarily about research on the pandemic, but about the experience of being an academic during the pandemic. Since part of that experience involves bringing our theoretical predilections to be

Recommended