
The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments
Brad Neal 1 056 episodes Nov 10, 2026
This podcast provides public access to recordings of U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments dating back to 2010. It aims to make the highest court more accessible to a modern audience by offering the arguments in podcast form. The project was created by a law student, and the description notes coverage from a DC Bar blog as well as a link for listener support.
Episodes

Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC
Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC | 11/10/26 | Docket #: 25-966
25-966 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR V. SUN VALLEY ORCHARDS, LLC
DECISION BELOW: 148 F.4th 121
THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IS GRANTED LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING
QUESTIONS: 1) WHETHER ARTICLE III OF THE CONSTITUTION PRECLUDES THE DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR FROM ADJUDICATING PROCEEDINGS TO COLLECT MONETARY REMEDIES FROM
EMPLOYE

Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. | 11/09/26 | Docket #: 25-159
25-159 HOFFMAN V. WBI ENERGY TRANSMISSION, INC.
DECISION BELOW: 132 F.4th 1058
CERT. GRANTED 6/29/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The Natural Gas Act authorizes private companies to condemn land in order to build
certain natural gas infrastructure, but it says nothing about how to determine the amount of
just compensation owed for

Nielsen v. Watanabe
Nielsen v. Watanabe | 11/09/26 | Docket #: 25-417
25-417 NIELSEN V. WATANABE
DECISION BELOW: 115 F.4th 1034
CERT. GRANTED 6/22/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
This case concerns the judicially created damages remedy first recognized in
Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics
, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). In
Carlson v.
Green
, 446 U.S. 14 (1980), the Court extended
Bivens
to an E

Guerrero v. Johnson
Guerrero v. Johnson | 11/04/26 | Docket #: 25-1003
25-1003 GUERRERO V. JOHNSON
DECISION BELOW: 23-70002
CERT. GRANTED 6/15/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) prohibits successive
habeas applications by state prisoners with only narrow exceptions, including for claims that
"rel[y] on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to ca

St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy
St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy | 11/03/26 | Docket #: 25-581
25-581 ST. MARY CATHOLIC PARISH V. ROY
DECISION BELOW: 154 F.4th 752
THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IS GRANTED LIMITED TO QUESTIONS 1 AND 2
PRESENTED BY THE PETITION.
CERT. GRANTED 4/20/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Colorado's so-called universal preschool program pays for families to send their children
to the preschool of the

Younge v. Fulton Judicial Circuit Dist. Attorney’s Office
Younge v. Fulton Judicial Circuit Dist. Attorney’s Office | 11/02/26 | Docket #: 25-352
25-352 YOUNGE V. FULTON JUDICIAL CIRC. DIST. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
DECISION BELOW: 2025 WL 974309
CERT. GRANTED 3/30/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Rule 8(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a party "must" plead
"any" affirmative defense. The question presented is:
Where a defendant has filed an

Maxwell v. Dinis
Maxwell v. Dinis | 11/02/26 | Docket #: 25-5930
25-5930 MAXWELL V. THOMAS
DECISION BELOW: 133 F.4th 453
QUESTION PRESENTED:
In 2020 Maxwell sought transfer to halfway house or home confinement under the First
Step Act of 2018, 18 U.S.C. §3624(g), 18 U.S.C. §3621(b) and §3621(h), the CARES Act of 2020,
18 U.S.C. §3624(c), the Second Chance Act of 2018 reauthorized by the First Step Act of 2018,

Salazar v. Paramount Global
Salazar v. Paramount Global | 10/14/26 | Docket #: 25-459
25-459 SALAZAR V. PARAMOUNT GLOBAL
DECISION BELOW: 133 F.4th 642
CERT. GRANTED 1/26/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The Video Privacy Protection Act
(“
VPPA
”)
contains a one-sentence liability clause. It
prohibits a
“
video tape service provider
”
from
“
knowingly disclos[ing], to any person,
personally identifiable information conc

Beaird v. United States
Beaird v. United States | 10/13/26 | Docket #: 25-5343
25-5343 BEAIRD V. UNITED STATES
DECISION BELOW: 2025 WL 1410410
THE MOTION OF PETITIONER FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IS GRANTED LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTION:
WHETHER
STINSON V. UNITED STATES
,
508
U. S.
36
(
1993
), STILL CORRECTLY STATES THE RULE
FOR THE DEFERENCE THAT

Department of Air Force v. Prutehi Guahan
Department of Air Force v. Prutehi Guahan | 10/07/26 | Docket #: 25-579
25-579 DEPT. OF AIR FORCE V. GUAHAN
DECISION BELOW: 128 F.4th 1089
CERT. GRANTED 3/9/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. 6901
et seq
., is a
comprehensive environmental statute providing for cradle-to-grave regulation of hazardous
waste through a scheme of cooperati

Anderson v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee
Anderson v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee | 10/06/26 | Docket #: 25-498
25-498 ANDERSON V. INTEL CORP. INV.
DECISION BELOW: 137 F.4th 1015
CERT. GRANTED 1/16/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), a plan fiduciary is
subject to a "[p]rudent man standard of care," which requires the fiduciary to "discharge his
duties with respect to

Johnson v. United States Congress
Johnson v. United States Congress | 10/05/26 | Docket #: 25-735
25-735 JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES CONGRESS
DECISION BELOW: 151 F.4th 1287
CERT. GRANTED 4/6/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Did the Veterans' Judicial Review Act strip district courts of the jurisdiction, recognized
by this Court in
Johnson v. Robison
, 415 U.S. 361 (1974), to hear challenges to the
constitutionality of acts of Congress af

Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Commissioners of Boulder County
Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Commissioners of Boulder County | 10/05/26 | Docket #: 25-170
25-170 SUNCOR ENERGY, INC. V. COMMISSIONERS OF BOULDER COUNTY
DECISION BELOW: 2025 WL 1363355
IN ADDITION TO THE QUESTION PRESENTED BY THE PETITION, THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO
BRIEF AND ARGUE THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: WHETHER THIS COURT HAS STATUTORY AND
ARTICLE III JURISDICTION TO HEAR THIS CASE.
SEPTEM

Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. | 04/29/26 | Docket #: 24-889
24-889 HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS V. AMARIN PHARMA, INC.
DECISION BELOW: 104 F.4th 1370
CERT. GRANTED 1/16/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Congress passed the Hatch-Waxman Act "[t]o facilitate the approval of generic drugs as
soon as patents allow."
Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
, 566 U.S. 399, 405
(2012).

Mullin, Sec. of Homeland Security v. Doe
Mullin, Sec. of Homeland Security v. Doe | 04/29/26 | Docket #: 25-1083
25-1083 MULLIN, SEC. DHS V. DOE
DECISION BELOW:
CONSIDERATION OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY (25A952) PRESENTED TO JUSTICE
SOTOMAYOR AND BY HER REFERRED TO THE COURT IS DEFERRED. CONSIDERATION OF THE
APPLICATION FOR STAY (25A999) PRESENTED TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND BY HIM REFERRED TO
THE COURT IS ALSO DEFERRED. THE APPLICATI

Cisco Systems v. Doe I
Cisco Systems v. Doe I | 04/28/26 | Docket #: 24-856
24-856 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. DOE I
DECISION BELOW: 73 F.4th 700
GRANTED LIMITED TO QUESTIONS 1 AND 3 PRESENTED BY THE PETITION.
CERT. GRANTED 1/9/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
1.
Whether the Alien Tort Statute ("ATS"), 28 U.S.C. § 1350, allows a judicially-implied
private right of action for aiding and abetting.
2.
Whether, if

Monsanto Co. v. Durnell
Monsanto Co. v. Durnell | 04/27/26 | Docket #: 24-1068
24-1068 MONSANTO CO. V. DURNELL
DECISION BELOW: 707 S.W.3d 828
GRANTED LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTION:
WHETHER THE FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT PREEMPTS A LABEL-
BASED FAILURE-TO-WARN CLAIM WHERE EPA HAS NOT REQUIRED THE WARNING.
CERT. GRANTED 1/16/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rode

Chatrie v. United States
Chatrie v. United States | 04/27/26 | Docket #: 25-112
25-112 CHATRIE V. UNITED STATES
DECISION BELOW: 136 F.4th 100
LIMITED TO QUESTION 1 PRESENTED BY THE PETITION.
CERT. GRANTED 1/16/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
This case concerns the constitutionality of geofence warrants. For cell phone users to
use certain services, their cell phones must continuously transmit their exact locations to their
se

Blanche, Acting Atty Gen. v. Lau
Blanche, Acting Atty Gen. v. Lau | 04/22/26 | Docket #: 25-429
25-429 BLANCHE V. LAU
DECISION BELOW: 130 F.4th 42
CERT. GRANTED 1/9/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Under 8 U.S.C. 1182(a), various categories of aliens, including those who have
committed or been convicted of certain crimes, are "ineligible to be admitted to the United
States" and subject to removal. 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2);
see 8 U.S.C.

FCC v. AT&T
FCC v. AT&T | 04/21/26 | Docket #: 25-406
25-406 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION V. AT&T
DECISION BELOW: 149 F.4th 491
CONSOLIDATED WITH 25-567 FOR ONE HOUR ORAL ARGUMENT.
CERT. GRANTED 1/9/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. 151
et seq
., empowers the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) to assess monetary forfeiture penalties for certain
violations of the

T. M. v. Univ. of MD Medical Sys. Corp.
T. M. v. Univ. of MD Medical Sys. Corp. | 04/20/26 | Docket #: 25-197
25-197 T.M. V. UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL SYSTEM CORPORATION
DECISION BELOW: 139 F.4th 344
CERT. GRANTED 12/5/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether the
Rooker-Feldman doctrine
can be triggered by a state-court decision that
remains subject to further review in state court.
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 24-1707

Sripetch v. SEC
Sripetch v. SEC | 04/20/26 | Docket #: 25-466
25-466 SRIPETCH V. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
DECISION BELOW: 154 F.4th 980
CERT. GRANTED 1/9/2026
QUESTION PRESENTED:
This case presents a clear and acknowledged conflict over an exceptionally important
question regarding the SEC's civil-enforcement power.
In
Liu v. SEC,
591 U.S. 71 (2020), this Court held the SEC may seek equitable
"dis

Trump, President of U.S. v. Barbara
Trump, President of U.S. v. Barbara | 04/01/26 | Docket #: 25-365
25-365 TRUMP V. BARBARA
DECISION BELOW:
CERT. GRANTED 12/5/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that those
"born * * * in
the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," are U.S. citizens. U.S. Const. Amend.
XIV, § 1. The Clause was adopted to confer citizenship on

Pitchford v. Cain
Pitchford v. Cain | 03/31/26 | Docket #: 24-7351
24-7351 PITCHFORD V. CAIN
DECISION BELOW: 126 F.4th 422
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 23-70009
QUESTION PRESENTED:
District Attorney Doug Evans convicted Terry Pitchford, aged 18 years at the time of the
crime, of capital murder and secured a death verdict in the Grenada Circuit Court before Judge
Joseph Loper on February 9, 2006, with the entirety of

Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties
Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties | 03/30/26 | Docket #: 25-83
25-83 JULES V. ANDRE BALAZS PROPERTIES
DECISION BELOW: 2025 WL 1201914
CERT. GRANTED 12/5/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Under Sections 9 and 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act, a party may apply to confirm or
vacate an arbitration award. But federal courts have limited jurisdiction over Section 9 and 10
applications. In
Badgerow v. Walter

Abouammo v. United States
Abouammo v. United States | 03/30/26 | Docket #: 25-5146
25-5146 ABOUAMMO V. UNITED STATES
DECISION BELOW: 122 F.4th 1072
GRANTED LIMITED TO QUESTION 1 PRESENTED BY THE PETITION.
CERT. GRANTED 12/5/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
As part of an investigation into a scheme to disclose nonpublic Twitter account
information to foreign actors, San Francisco-based FBI agents visited Petitioner Ahmad
Abouam

Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock
Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock | 03/25/26 | Docket #: 24-935
24-935 FLOWER FOODS, INC. V. BROCK
DECISION BELOW: 121 F.4th 753
CERT. GRANTED 10/20/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Are workers who deliver locally goods that travel in interstate commerce-but who do
not transport the goods across borders nor interact with vehicles that cross
borders-"transportation workers" "engaged in foreign or interstate

Noem, Sec. of Homeland v. Al Otro Lado
Noem, Sec. of Homeland v. Al Otro Lado | 03/24/26 | Docket #: 25-5
25-5 NOEM V. AL OTRO LADO
DECISION BELOW: 138 F.4th 1102
CERT. GRANTED 11/17/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101
et seq
. , provides that an alien who
"arrives in the United States" may apply for asylum and must be inspected by an immigration
officer. 8 U.S.C. 1158(b)(1)(A), 1225(a)(1) an

Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc.
Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc. | 03/24/26 | Docket #: 25-6
25-6 KEATHLEY V. BUDDY AYERS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
DECISION BELOW: 2025 WL 673434
CERT. GRANTED 10/20/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Judicial estoppel is an equitable doctrine designed '"to protect the integrity of the
judicial process' by 'prohibiting parties from deliberately changing positions"' to gain an unfair
advantage.
New

Watson v. RNC
Watson v. RNC | 03/23/26 | Docket #: 24-1260
24-1260 WATSON V. REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
DECISION BELOW: 120 F.4th 200
CERT. GRANTED 11/10/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The federal election-day statutes-2 U.S.C. § 7, 2 U.S.C. § 1, and 3 U.S.C. § 1-set the
Tuesday after the first Monday in November in certain years as the "election" day for federal
offices. Like all other States, Mississippi requ

Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC
Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC | 03/04/26 | Docket #: 24-1238
24-1238 MONTGOMERY V. CARIBE TRANSPORT II, LLC
DECISION BELOW: 124 F.4th 1053
CERT. GRANTED 10/3/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The common law permits a cause of action for negligent selection. For example, a
person injured in a truck crash has a cause of action against someone that negligently selected
the truck driver to transpor

Hunter v. United States
Hunter v. United States | 03/03/26 | Docket #: 24-1063
24-1063 HUNTER V. UNITED STATES
DECISION BELOW: 2025 WL 5003582
CERT. GRANTED 10/10/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
This Court has recognized that "no appeal waiver serves as an absolute bar to all
appellate claims."
Garza v. Idaho
, 586 U.S. 232, 238 (2019). But the Court has "ma[de] no
statement ... on what particular exceptions [to appeal waiv

United States v. Hemani
United States v. Hemani | 03/02/26 | Docket #: 24-1234
24-1234 UNITED STATES V. HEMANI
DECISION BELOW: 2025 WL 354982
CERT. GRANTED 10/20/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3), the federal statute that prohibits the possession of
firearms by a person who "is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance,"
violates the Second Amendment as applied to respondent.
LOWER

Pung v. Isabella County
Pung v. Isabella County | 02/25/26 | Docket #: 25-95
25-95 PUNG V. ISABELLA COUNTY, MICHIGAN
DECISION BELOW: 2025 WL 318222
CERT. GRANTED 10/3/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Isabella County confiscated the Pung Estate's private home for approximately $2,200 in
taxes and fees (that were never actually owed). The lower courts used the artificially depressed
auction sale price rather than the property's

Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel
Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel | 02/24/26 | Docket #: 24-783
24-783 ENBRIDGE ENERGY, LP V. NESSEL
DECISION BELOW: 104 F.4th 958
CERT. GRANTED 6/30/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether district courts have the authority to excuse the thirty-day procedural time
limit for removal in 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(1).
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 23-1671

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S.A.
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. | 02/23/26 | Docket #: 24-699
24-699 EXXON MOBIL CORP. V. CORPORACION CIMEX
DECISION BELOW: 111 F.4th 12
CERT. GRANTED 10/3/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
In 1960, the Cuban government confiscated the property of American nationals and
transferred it to state-owned enterprises. After years without a diplomatic resolution, Congress
enacted the Helms-Burton

Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises
Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises | 02/23/26 | Docket #: 24-983
24-983 HAVANA DOCKS CORP. V. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES
DECISION BELOW: 119 F.4th 1276
CERT. GRANTED 10/3/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The LIBERTAD Act is an essential pillar of United States foreign policy toward Cuba's
hostile and anti-American regime. Title III of that Act creates a private right of action for United
States

Trump, President of U.S. v. Cook
Trump, President of U.S. v. Cook | 01/21/26 | Docket #: 25A312
25A312 TRUMP V. COOK
DECISION BELOW: 2025 WL 2654786
THE APPLICATION FOR STAY PRESENTED TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND BY HIM REFERRED TO THE
COURT IS DEFERRED PENDING ORAL ARGUMENT IN JANUARY 2026.
JURISDICTION NOTED 10/1/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER:

M & K Employee Solutions v. Trustees of the IAM Pension Fund
M & K Employee Solutions v. Trustees of the IAM Pension Fund | 01/20/26 | Docket #: 23-1209
23-1209 M & K EMPLOYEE SOLUTIONS, LLC V. TRUSTEES OF THE IAM PENSION FUND
DECISION BELOW: 92 F.4th 316
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act imposes "withdrawal liability"
when an employer withdraws from an underfunded multiemployer pension plan. This
withdrawal liabilty covers

Wolford v. Lopez
Wolford v. Lopez | 01/20/26 | Docket #: 24-1046
24-1046 WOLFORD V. LOPEZ
DECISION BELOW: 116 F.4th 959
LIMITED TO QUESTION 1 PRESENTED BY THE PETITION.
CERT. GRANTED 10/3/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen
, 597 U.S. 1, 33 (2022), holds that
"the Second Amendment guarantees a general right to public carry" of arms, meaning ordinary,
law-abiding cit

Galette v. NJ Transit Corp.
Galette v. NJ Transit Corp. | 01/14/26 | Docket #: 24-1021
24-1021 GALETTE V. NJ TRANSIT CORP.
DECISION BELOW: 332 A.3d 776
THE PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF CERTIORARI ARE GRANTED, LIMITED TO
THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: WHETHER THE NEW JERSEY TRANSIT
CORPORATION IS AN ARM OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY FOR INTERSTATE
SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY PURPOSES.
CONSOLIDATED FOR ONE HOUR ORAL ARGUMENT WITH
24-1113
.
ORDER

West Virginia v. B. P. J.
West Virginia v. B. P. J. | 01/13/26 | Docket #: 24-43
24-43 WEST VIRGINIA V. B.P.J.
DECISION BELOW: 98 F.4th 542
CERT. GRANTED 7/3/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Like everywhere else, West Virginia schools offer separate sports teams for boys
and girls. The West Virginia Legislature concluded that biological boys should compete
on boys' and co-ed teams but not girls' teams. This separation made sens

Little v. Hecox
Little v. Hecox | 01/13/26 | Docket #: 24-38
24-38 LITTLE, GOVERNOR OF IDAHO V. HECOX
DECISION BELOW: 104 F.4th 1061
ORDER OF OCTOBER 20, 2025:
RESPONDENT'S REQUEST THAT THE COURT DISMISS THE CASE AS MOOT IS DEFERRED PENDING
ORAL ARGUMENT. SEE
ACHESON HOTELS, LLC v. LAUFER
, 601 U. S. 1, 4 (2023).
CERT. GRANTED 7/3/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Women and girls have overcome decades of discrimination

Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish
Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish | 01/12/26 | Docket #: 24-813
24-813 CHEVRON USA INC. V. PLAQUEMINES PARISH
DECISION BELOW: 103 F.4th 324
January
8
,
2026
JUSTICE ALITO WILL NOT CONTINUE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS CASE.
CERT. GRANTED 6/16/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
This petition arises from Louisiana parishes' efforts to hold petitioners liable in
state court for,
inter alia
, production of

FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund
FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund | 12/10/25 | Docket #: 24-345
24-345 FS CREDIT CORP. V. SABA CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD.
DECISION BELOW: 2024 WL 3174971
CERT. GRANTED 6/30/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The courts of appeals have split 2-1 over whether Congress created an implied
private right of action in Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act (ICA), which
provides:
(1)

Hamm v. Smith
Hamm v. Smith | 12/10/25 | Docket #: 24-872
24-872 HAMM, COMMISSIONER AL DOC V. SMITH
DECISION BELOW: 2024 WL 4793028
THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IS GRANTED LIMITED TO THE
FOLLOWING QUESTION: WHETHER AND HOW COURTS MAY CONSIDER THE
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF MULTIPLE IQ SCORES IN ASSESSING AN ATKINS
CLAIM.
CERT. GRANTED 6/6/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Like most States, Alabama requires that o

NRSC v. FEC
NRSC v. FEC | 12/09/25 | Docket #: 24-621
24-621 NRSC V. FEC
DECISION BELOW: 117 F.4th 389
Order of July 1, 2025:
ROMAN MARTINEZ, ESQUIRE, OF WASHINGTON, D. C., IS INVITED TO BRIEF
AND ARGUE THIS CASE, AS
AMICUS CURIAE
, IN SUPPORT OF THE JUDGMENT
BELOW.
Order of December
5
,
2025
:
THE MOTION OF COURT-APPOINTED AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF THE JUDGMENT BELOW
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL

Trump, President of United States v. Slaughter
Trump, President of United States v. Slaughter | 12/08/25 | Docket #: 25-332
25-332 TRUMP V. SLAUGHTER
DECISION BELOW:
THE APPLICATION FOR STAY PRESENTED TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND BY HIM
REFERRED TO THE COURT IS GRANTED. THE JULY
17,2025
ORDER OF THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, NO.
25
–
CV
–
909
, ECF DOC.
52
, IS STAYED. THE APPLICATION IS ALSO TREATED AS A

Olivier v. City of Brandon
Olivier v. City of Brandon | 12/03/25 | Docket #: 24-993
24-993 OLIVIER V. BRANDON, MS
DECISION BELOW: 2023 WL 5500223
CERT. GRANTED 7/3/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Gabriel Olivier is a Christian who feels called to share the gospel with his fellow
citizens. After being arrested and fined for violating an ordinance targeting "protests"
outside a public amphitheater, Olivier brought a § 1983 suit u

First Choice Women's Resource Centers v. Platkin
First Choice Women's Resource Centers v. Platkin | 12/02/25 | Docket #: 24-781
24-781 FIRST CHOICE WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTERS, INC. V. PLATKIN
DECISION BELOW: 2024 WL 5088105
CERT. GRANTED 6/16/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
New Jersey's Attorney General served an investigatory subpoena on First Choice
Women's Resource Centers, Inc., a faith-based pregnancy center, demanding that it
turn over most of i

Urias-Orellana v. Bondi, Att'y Gen.
Urias-Orellana v. Bondi, Att'y Gen. | 12/01/25 | Docket #: 24-777
24-777 URIAS-ORELLANA V. BONDI
DECISION BELOW: 121 F.4th 327
CERT. GRANTED 6/30/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides that noncitizens on American
soil are generally eligible for asylum if they qualify as a "refugee." 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)
(A). A refugee is someone with "a well-founded fear of

Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment
Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment | 12/01/25 | Docket #: 24-171
24-171 COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. V. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT
DECISION BELOW: 93 F.4th 222
CERT. GRANTED 6/30/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
1. This Court has held that a business commits contributory copyright
infringement when it "distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe
copyright, as shown by c

Rutherford v. United States
Rutherford v. United States | 11/12/25 | Docket #: 24-820
24-820 RUTHERFORD V. UNITED STATES
DECISION BELOW: 120 F.4th 360
CONSOLIDATED FOR ONE HOUR ORAL ARGUMENT WITH 24-860
CERT. GRANTED 6/6/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The compassionate-release statute permits courts to reduce a prisoner's
sentence if the court finds that "extraordinary and compelling reasons" warrant relief. 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)

Fernandez v. United States
Fernandez v. United States | 11/12/25 | Docket #: 24-556
24-556 FERNANDEZ V. UNITED STATES
DECISION BELOW: 104 F.4th 420
THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IS GRANTED LIMITED TO THE
FOLLOWING QUESTION: WHETHER A COMBINATION OF
“
EXTRAORDINARY AND
COMPELLING REASONS
”
THAT MAY WARRANT A DISCRETIONARY SENTENCE
REDUCTION UNDER 18 U. S. C. §3582(c)(1)(A) CAN INCLUDE REASONS THAT
MAY ALSO BE

GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal
GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal | 11/10/25 | Docket #: 24-758
24-758 THE GEO GROUP, INC. V. MENOCAL
DECISION BELOW: 2024 WL 4544184
CERT. GRANTED 6/2/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, the courts of appeals "have jurisdiction of appeals from all final
decisions of the district courts." This Court has held that certain orders are immediately
appealable under Section 1291 even though the

Landor v. LA DOC
Landor v. LA DOC | 11/10/25 | Docket #: 23-1197
23-1197 LANDOR V. LA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
DECISION BELOW: 82 F.4th 337
CERT. GRANTED 6/23/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Congress has enacted two "sister" statutes to protect religious exercise: the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. 2000bb
et seq
., and the
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA),

Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of U.S.
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of U.S. | 11/05/25 | Docket #: 24-1287
24-1287 LEARNING RESOURCES, INC. V. TRUMP
DECISION BELOW:
THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BEFORE JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. CONSOLIDATED
WITH 25-250 FOR ONE HOUR ORAL ARGUMENT. EXPEDITED BRIEFING. THE CASES WILL BE SET
FOR ARGUMENT IN THE FIRST WEEK OF THE NOVEMBER 2025 ARGUMENT SESSION.
CERT. GRANTED 9

Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist
Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist | 11/04/25 | Docket #: 24-724
24-724 HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP V. PALMQUIST
DECISION BELOW: 103 F.4th 294
CERT. GRANTED 4/28/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Respondents, citizens of Texas, filed this products-liability suit in state court
against Petitioners Hain Celestial Group, Inc., then a citizen of Delaware and New York,
and Whole Foods, Inc., a citizen of Texas. Hain

Coney Island Auto Parts, Inc. v. Burton
Coney Island Auto Parts, Inc. v. Burton | 11/04/25 | Docket #: 24-808
24-808 CONEY ISLAND AUTO PARTS, INC. V. BURTON
DECISION BELOW: 109 F.4th 438
CERT. GRANTED 6/6/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Well-settled legal principles dictate that a judgment entered in the absence of
personal jurisdiction is void. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) authorizes federal
courts to vacate a judgment when it

Hencely v. Fluor Corp.
Hencely v. Fluor Corp. | 11/03/25 | Docket #: 24-924
24-924 HENCELY V. FLUOR CORP.
DECISION BELOW: 120 F.4th 412
CERT. GRANTED 6/2/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Former U.S. Army Specialist Winston T. Hencely was critically and permanently injured
by a suicide bomber inside Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan. The bomber, Ahmad Nayeb, worked
on base for a government contractor. An Army investigation found

Rico v. United States
Rico v. United States | 11/03/25 | Docket #: 24-1056
24-1056 RICO V. UNITED STATES
DECISION BELOW: 2025 WL 720900
CERT. GRANTED 6/30/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether the fugitive-tolling doctrine applies in the context of supervised release.
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 24-2662

Case v. Montana
Case v. Montana | 10/15/25 | Docket #: 24-624
24-624 CASE V. MONTANA
DECISION BELOW: 553 P.3d 985
CERT. GRANTED 6/2/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant based on
less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring, or whether the emergency-aid
exception requires probable cause.
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: DA 23-0136

Louisiana v. Callais
Louisiana v. Callais | 10/15/25 | Docket #: 24-109
Background: Louisiana was ordered by federal courts to create a second majority-Black congressional district to comply with the Voting Rights Act. The Louisiana Legislature responded by passing S.B. 8, which created the required second majority-Black district. However, a different federal court then ruled that S.B. 8 was an unconstitutiona

Ellingburg v. United States
Ellingburg v. United States | 10/14/25 | Docket #: 24-482
24-482 ELLINGBURG V. UNITED STATES
DECISION BELOW: 113 F.4th 839
JOHN F. BASH, ESQUIRE, OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, IS INVITED TO BRIEF AND
ARGUE THIS CASE, AS
AMICUS CURIAE
, IN SUPPORT OF THE JUDGMENT
BELOW.
CERT. GRANTED 4/7/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) is
penal for pu

Bowe v. United States
Bowe v. United States | 10/14/25 | Docket #: 24-5438
24-5438 BOWE V. UNITED STATES
DECISION BELOW: CA 11 ORDER 6/27/2024
KASDIN M. MITCHELL, ESQUIRE, OF DALLAS, TEXAS, IS INVITED TO BRIEF AND ARGUE
THIS CASE, AS AMICUS CURIAE, IN SUPPORT OF THE JUDGMENT BELOW AS TO
QUESTION 1 PRESENTED BY THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.
CERT. GRANTED 1/17/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b

OK Charter School Board v. Drummond
OK Charter School Board v. Drummond | 04/30/25 | Docket #: 24-394
24-394 OK CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD V. DRUMMOND
DECISION BELOW: 558 P.3d 1
CONSOLIDATED WITH
24-396
FOR ONE HOUR ORAL ARGUMENT.
JUSTICE
BARRETT TOOK NO PART.
EXPEDITED BRIEFING.
CERT. GRANTED 1/24/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
This Court has "repeatedly held that a State violates the Free Exercise Clause
when it excludes religious o

USPS v. Konan
USPS v. Konan | 10/08/25 | Docket #: 24-351
24-351 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE V. KONAN
DECISION BELOW: 96 F.4th 799
CERT. GRANTED 4/21/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), ch. 753, 60 Stat. 842 (28 U.S.C. 1346(b), 2671
et
seq
.), generally waives the United States' sovereign immunity for suits seeking damages "for
injury or loss of property, or personal injury or deat

Bost v. IL Bd. of Elections
Bost v. IL Bd. of Elections | 10/08/25 | Docket #: 24-568
24-568 BOST V. ILLINOIS BOARD OF ELECTIONS
DECISION BELOW: 114 F.4th 634
CERT. GRANTED 6/2/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Federal law sets the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November as the
federal Election Day. 2 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 7; and 3 U.S.C. § 1. Several states, including
Illinois, have enacted state laws that allow ballots to be

Barrett v. United States
Barrett v. United States | 10/07/25 | Docket #: 24-5774
24-5774 BARRETT V. UNITED STATES
DECISION BELOW: 102 F.4th 60
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IS GRANTED LIMITED TO QUESTION
1
PRESENTED BY THE PETITION.
CHARLES L. McCLOUD, ESQUIRE, OF WASHINGTON, D. C., IS INVITED TO BRIEF AND
ARGUE THIS CASE, AS
AMICUS CURIAE
, IN SUPPORT OF THE JUDGMENT BELOW.
CERT. GRANTED 3/3/2025
QUESTION PRESE

Chiles v. Salazar
Chiles v. Salazar | 10/07/25 | Docket #: 24-539
24-539 CHILES V. SALAZAR
DECISION BELOW: 116 F.4th 1178
CERT. GRANTED 3/10/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Kaley Chiles is a licensed counselor who helps people by talking with them. A
practicing Christian, Chiles believes that people flourish when they live consistently with
God's design, including their biological sex. Many of her clients seek her coun

Villarreal v. Texas
Villarreal v. Texas | 10/06/25 | Docket #: 24-557
24-557 VILLARREAL V. TEXAS
DECISION BELOW: 707 S.W.3d 138
CERT. GRANTED 4/7/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether a trial court abridges the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel by
prohibiting the defendant and his counsel from discussing the defendant's testimony during an
overnight recess.
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: PD-0048-20

Berk v. Choy
Berk v. Choy | 10/06/25 | Docket #: 24-440
24-440 BERK V. CHOY
DECISION BELOW: 2024 WL 5354482
CERT. GRANTED 3/10/2025
QUESTION PRESENTED:
This case presents a clear, recognized, entrenched conflict over an important
question about the application of state procedural rules in federal court.
Delaware, like numerous states, requires that in certain actions the plaintiff must
also file an affidavi

Trump v. CASA, Inc.
Trump v. CASA, Inc. | 05/15/25 | Docket #: 24A884

Laboratory Corp. of America v. Davis
Laboratory Corp. of America v. Davis | 04/29/25 | Docket #: 24-304

Martin v. United States
Martin v. United States | 04/29/25 | Docket #: 24-362

Soto v. United States
Soto v. United States | 04/28/25 | Docket #: 24-320

A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools
A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools | 04/28/25 | Docket #: 24-249

Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA
Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA | 04/23/25 | Docket #: 24-7

CIR v. Zuch
CIR v. Zuch | 04/22/25 | Docket #: 24-416

Mahmoud v. Taylor
Mahmoud v. Taylor | 04/22/25 | Docket #: 24-297
Recommended

Heaven’s Gate Academy

Deadline: White House

The Great Detectives of Old Time Radio| Daily Mystery Dramas

TED Business

Ranger Bill | Old Time Radio Adventure & Family Drama

زن بودن

Christmas Old Time Radio

The Adventures of Superman | Old Time Radio

Booked, Blonde & Busy w/ Olivia Ponton

The Human-Animal Connection - Pet Life Radio Original

Medicine with Meaning

Homemaking with Jesus | Weekly Devotionals, Biblical Application, Simple Living, Home Management, Healthy Relationships