Home Podcasts Allegedly Golden
Allegedly Golden

Allegedly Golden

Not Actually Golden 32 Episodes Oct 14, 2026

Allegedly Golden is a legal podcast hosted by a civil litigator with 25 years of experience, breaking down high-profile lawsuits by examining actual court documents and legal strategy. It aims to explain how the civil justice system works and why media coverage often misses the mark, covering cases like celebrity defamation, corporate disputes, and civil rights. The show balances serious legal analysis with an appreciation for the drama inherent in these cases, and offers bonus content through Patreon.

Episodes

Post-Vacation Checkup: Jane Doe's Big Decision, Plus Updates In Cornell, Clancy, Jones, & Wallace
Post-Vacation Checkup: Jane Doe's Big Decision, Plus Updates In Cornell, Clancy, Jones, & Wallace Oct 14, 2026 4108 I'm fresh from vacation and ready to dive back in!  We have a complete change in the Amy Griffin case from last week, with Jane Doe now deciding whether to abandon her original California case and move everything to Nevada.  There's major movement coming in the litigation involving Stephanie Jones and Jed Wallace, and I share some thoughts on Cornell and Clancy. Want to go deeper? If you
Time to Talk Title IX: Why A Federal Sex Discrimination Law Is Central to the Lawsuits Involving Cornell and the Idaho 4 Murders
Time to Talk Title IX: Why A Federal Sex Discrimination Law Is Central to the Lawsuits Involving Cornell and the Idaho 4 Murders Oct 7, 2026 4779 Two of the biggest cases on our docket this week involve the same law, one I've worked with for many years. So, this week we're talking about Title IX. What does it require, and where do its requirements end? Should it be used to hold both Cornell and Washington State University accountable for actions within their communities? Should universities be involved in these matters in the firs
Being the Voice of Reason When the Internet Loses Its Mind: Making Content in 2026
Being the Voice of Reason When the Internet Loses Its Mind: Making Content in 2026 Sep 23, 2026 3879 This week I'm processing out loud what its like to be a content creator in the time of Clancy and the other cases that capture our attention. What do I give credence to, and what do I ignore? How do I compare your content to others' and what ethical limitations do I put on myself? This episode doesn't have a whole lot of answers, but if you are also scrolling and thinking "what
Lindsay Clancy Trial Debrief: Making Sense of What We Saw, What We Learned, and What We're Still Wondering
Lindsay Clancy Trial Debrief: Making Sense of What We Saw, What We Learned, and What We're Still Wondering Sep 16, 2026 5051 After weeks of following the Clancy trial, I needed a whole episode to process the journey. We started with a coming together of women on the issue of postpartum struggles, then ended with a mistrial and Patrick sending cease and desist letters. What happened, and how did it evolve? What do we do with this last minute information about the holdout juror, if anything? And where does this leave us t
The Sports Episode: Why the SEC Is Suing Lane Kiffin, the Bama Basketball Player Who Won A Defamation Case Against the New York Times, and the NBA Lawyers' Report On the Clippers' Shady Dealings Regarding Kawhi Leonard
The Sports Episode: Why the SEC Is Suing Lane Kiffin, the Bama Basketball Player Who Won A Defamation Case Against the New York Times, and the NBA Lawyers' Report On the Clippers' Shady Dealings Regarding Kawhi Leonard Sep 9, 2026 5636 We all need a a break from heavy cases like Lindsay Clancy, so this week we're talking about litigation in the sports world, with special guest Mr. NAG. The New York Times was recently found liable for defamation for the first time in 50 years for reporting about a college basketball player. The SEC sued Louisiana State University last week over its attempt to bring players back from the NFL
Celebrity & High Profile Lawsuits: A Guide
Celebrity & High Profile Lawsuits: A Guide Aug 26, 2026 3606 If you've been following true crime but lawsuits make your head spin, this is the video for you! I'm breaking down the civil process, including all the insider information about how it really works in practice. Most importantly, I point out all the ways the media coverage can manipulate whats really happening, so you can read between the lines the same way I do. Want to go deeper? If you
Netflix Seeks to Throw Out Tyra's Case, Why Jane Doe Might Ultimately Prefer Settlement Over a Jury Verdict, and that Damn Bow
Netflix Seeks to Throw Out Tyra's Case, Why Jane Doe Might Ultimately Prefer Settlement Over a Jury Verdict, and that Damn Bow Aug 19, 2026 3447 In this episode, Netflix points out the hypocrisy of Tyra Banks suing over her edit in the ANTM documentary in asking for the case to be thrown out. I'm thinking through all the factors that the parties might consider when trying to resolve the Amy Griffin case, including where Sam Lansky fits into it all. Plus, how fashion absolutely matters for lawyers. Want to go deeper? If you want deeper
The SLOMW Case Has Settled, What Jane Doe and Amy Griffin Should Ask For In Discovery, and How Do You Separate Critical Thinking From Conspiracy Theory?
The SLOMW Case Has Settled, What Jane Doe and Amy Griffin Should Ask For In Discovery, and How Do You Separate Critical Thinking From Conspiracy Theory? Aug 12, 2026 3830 This week, we're looking at the Patrick Clancy theory as and example of critical thinking that may have gone too far, and how to recognize when a theory has jumped into conspiracy territory. Maricano has settled his case with Demi, and my head is swimming with the types of discovery that may now happen in the Amy Griffin case. Want to go deeper? If you want deeper dives, bonus episodes, and s
I Think the Speculation About Jane Doe Settling is Wrong, The Lindsay Clancy Case Is About More Than Murder, & What The Hell is a JD Degree?
I Think the Speculation About Jane Doe Settling is Wrong, The Lindsay Clancy Case Is About More Than Murder, & What The Hell is a JD Degree? Aug 5, 2026 3294 This episode is a little bit of everything, from the speculation that Jane Doe wants to settle her case to why a lawyer's degree is a doctor but not a doctorate. I also share some tea on what it was like to meet up with the ladies in California. Want to go deeper? If you want deeper dives, bonus episodes, and some very honest work-and-life talk, come hang out with me on Patreon: https://www.p
Best of: A Conversation With Wayfarer Lawyer Kevin Fritz
Best of: A Conversation With Wayfarer Lawyer Kevin Fritz Jul 30, 2026 4341 An episode we've all been waiting for! Little Girl Attorney and I sat down with Kevin Fritz of Meister Seelig & Schuster, who represents Wayfarer, to discuss the Lively case and what it's like to be a lawyer in highly publicized litigation. We talked about everything from Vanzan to how he became such a good writer, plus whether social media content was a positive or negative for the
Do Reality Stars Waive Potential Lawsuits When They're Hired On A Show? Looking At Marciano's SLOMW Agreement  In His Defamation Case Against Demi
Do Reality Stars Waive Potential Lawsuits When They're Hired On A Show? Looking At Marciano's SLOMW Agreement In His Defamation Case Against Demi Jul 22, 2026 4176 In this episode we look at the language of the Performer Agreement Marciano (and presumably, all the cast) signed for SLOMW, which the production company is trying to use to have his case thrown out. What do reality stars agree to give up, and will a court actually enforce it? Plus, new updates in the JP Morgan case, a big Candace Owen hearing, and whether Karen Read can sell her story to pay her
What Happened In the Karen Read Federal Court Hearing This Week, From A Lawyer Who Was There
What Happened In the Karen Read Federal Court Hearing This Week, From A Lawyer Who Was There Jul 16, 2026 3666 This episode is dedicated entirely to the hearings held on July 14th, 2026 in 2 of the 4 active civil cases involving Karen Read.  I take you into the Federal Court hearing in Read's civil rights case that the McCabes, Alberts, and Higgins are asking the court to dismiss-who was there, how the lawyers did, and what it seemed the judge was interested in.  Then I contrast that with the morning

Recommended