
Supreme Court Oral Arguments
This podcast delivers the official audio recordings of oral arguments presented at the U.S. Supreme Court. New arguments are added automatically as soon as they are released on supremecourt.gov. Each episode includes detailed descriptions of the case facts from oyez.org, along with links to docket information. Convenient chapters allow listeners to jump directly to exchanges between specific justices and advocates once transcripts are available.
Episodes
![[25-1083] Mullin v. Doe](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-1083] Mullin v. Doe
Mullin v. Doe
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 29, 2026.
Petitioner: Markwayne Mullin, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.Respondent: Dahlia Doe.
Advocates: D. John Sauer (for the Petitioners)
Ahilan T. Arulanantham (for the Respondents in Case No. 25-1083)
Geoffrey M. Pipoly (for the Respondents in Case No. 25-1084)
Facts of the case (from oyez.or
![[24-889] Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-889] Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 29, 2026.
Petitioner: Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.Respondent: Amarin Pharma, Inc.
Advocates: Charles B. Klein (for the Petitioners)
Malcolm L. Stewart (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Michael R. Huston (for the Respondents)
Facts of
![[24-856] Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-856] Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 28, 2026.
Petitioner: Cisco Systems, Inc.Respondent: Doe I.
Advocates: Kannon K. Shanmugam (for the Petitioners)
Curtis E. Gannon (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Paul L. Hoffman (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Beginning in the 199
![[25-112] Chatrie v. United States](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-112] Chatrie v. United States
Chatrie v. United States
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 27, 2026.
Petitioner: Okello T. Chatrie.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Adam G. Unikowsky (for the Petitioner)
Eric J. Feigin (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Okello Chatrie was arrested in connection with the armed robbery of a bank in Richmond, Virginia,
![[24-1068] Monsanto Company v. Durnell](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-1068] Monsanto Company v. Durnell
Monsanto Company v. Durnell
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 27, 2026.
Petitioner: Monsanto Company.Respondent: John L. Durnell.
Advocates: Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioner)
Sarah M. Harris (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Ashley C. Keller (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
John L. Durnell used
![[25-429] Blanche v. Lau](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-429] Blanche v. Lau
Blanche v. Lau
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 22, 2026.
Petitioner: Todd Blanche, Acting Attorney General.Respondent: Muk Choi Lau.
Advocates: Sopan Joshi (for the Petitioner)
Shay Dvoretzky (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Muk Choi Lau, a native and citizen of China, was admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resi
![[25-406] Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc.](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-406] Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc.
Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 21, 2026.
Petitioner: Federal Communications Commission, et al.Respondent: AT&T, Inc. .
Advocates: Jeffrey B. Wall (for AT&T, Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc.)
Vivek Suri (for the FCC, et al.)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Between 2014 and 2019, AT&T operated a
![[25-466] Sripetch v. SEC](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-466] Sripetch v. SEC
Sripetch v. SEC
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 20, 2026.
Petitioner: Ongkaruck Sripetch.Respondent: Securities and Exchange Commission.
Advocates: Daniel L. Geyser (for the Petitioner)
Malcolm L. Stewart (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
From at least 2013 to 2019, Ongkaruck Sripetch participated in a series of fraudulent securit
![[25-197] T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-197] T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation
T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 20, 2026.
Petitioner: T. M.Respondent: University of Maryland Medical System Corporation.
Advocates: Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the Petitioner)
Lisa S. Blatt (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In March 2023, T.M., a woman with a rare medical
![[25-365] Trump v. Barbara](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-365] Trump v. Barbara
Trump v. Barbara
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 1, 2026.
Petitioner: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States.Respondent: Barbara.
Advocates: D. John Sauer (for the Petitioners)
Cecillia D. Wang (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
On January 20, 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order No. 14,160, titled “Prot
![[24-7351] Pitchford v. Cain](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-7351] Pitchford v. Cain
Pitchford v. Cain
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 31, 2026.
Petitioner: Terry Pitchford.Respondent: Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections.
Advocates: Joseph J. Perkovich (for the Petitioner)
Scott G. Stewart (for the Respondents)
Emily M. Ferguson (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the c
![[25-5146] Abouammo v. United States](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-5146] Abouammo v. United States
Abouammo v. United States
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 30, 2026.
Petitioner: Ahmad Abouammo.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Tobias S. Loss-Eaton (for the Petitioner)
Anthony A. Yang (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2013, Twitter hired Ahmad Abouammo, a U.S. citizen, as a Media Partnerships Manager responsib
![[25-83] Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-83] Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties
Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 30, 2026.
Petitioner: Adrian Jules.Respondent: Andre Balazs Properties.
Advocates: Adam G. Unikowsky (for the Petitioner)
Daniel L. Geyser (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Adrian Jules worked at the Chateau Marmont hotel in Los Angeles until he was fired in March 2
![[24-935] Flower Foods, Inc. v. Brock](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-935] Flower Foods, Inc. v. Brock
Flower Foods, Inc. v. Brock
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 25, 2026.
Petitioner: Flower Foods, Inc., et al.Respondent: Angelo Brock.
Advocates: Traci L. Lovitt (for the Petitioners)
Jennifer D. Bennett (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Petitioners—the defendants, collectively known as “Flowers”—produce and sell packaged baked go
![[25-6] Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Incorporated](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-6] Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Incorporated
Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Incorporated
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 24, 2026.
Petitioner: Thomas Keathley.Respondent: Buddy Ayers Construction, Incorporated.
Advocates: Gregory G. Garre (for the Petitioner)
Frederick Liu (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting vacatur)
William M. Jay (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from
![[25-5] Noem v. Al Otro Lado](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-5] Noem v. Al Otro Lado
Noem v. Al Otro Lado
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 24, 2026.
Petitioner: Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security.Respondent: Al Otro Lado, a California Corporation.
Advocates: Vivek Suri (for the Petitioners)
Kelsi B. Corkran (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Beginning in 2016, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) imple
![[24-1260] Watson v. Republican National Committee](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-1260] Watson v. Republican National Committee
Watson v. Republican National Committee
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 23, 2026.
Petitioner: Michael Watson, Mississippi Secretary of State.Respondent: Republican National Committee, et al.
Advocates: Scott G. Stewart (for the Petitioner)
Paul D. Clement (for the Respondents)
D. John Sauer (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
![[24-1238] Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-1238] Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC
Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 4, 2026.
Petitioner: Shawn Montgomery.Respondent: Caribe Transport II, LLC.
Advocates: Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioner)
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. (for the Respondents)
Sopan Joshi (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
![[24-1063] Hunter v. United States](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-1063] Hunter v. United States
Hunter v. United States
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 3, 2026.
Petitioner: Munson P. Hunter.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Lisa S. Blatt (for the Petitioner)
Zoe A. Jacoby (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Munson P. Hunter, III pleaded guilty to committing wire fraud affecting a financial institution and to aid
![[24-1234] United States v. Hemani](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-1234] United States v. Hemani
United States v. Hemani
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 2, 2026.
Petitioner: United States of America.Respondent: Ali Danial Hemani.
Advocates: Sarah M. Harris (for the Petitioner)
Erin E. Murphy (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
A grand jury indicted Ali Danial Hemani in February 2023 for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), a federa
![[25-95] Pung v. Isabella County](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-95] Pung v. Isabella County
Pung v. Isabella County
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 25, 2026.
Petitioner: Michael Pung, Personal Representative of the Estate of Timothy Scott Pung.Respondent: sabella County, Michigan.
Advocates: Philip L. Ellison (for the Petitioner)
Frederick Liu (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party)
Matthew T. Nelson (for the Respondent)
![[24-783] Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-783] Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel
Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 24, 2026.
Petitioner: Enbridge Energy, LP.Respondent: Dana Nessel, Attorney General of Michigan.
Advocates: John J. Bursch (for the Petitioners)
Ann M. Sherman (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Enbridge Energy, LP, owns and operates Line 5, an oil pipeline that transpor
![[24-983] Havana Docks Corporation v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-983] Havana Docks Corporation v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
Havana Docks Corporation v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 23, 2026.
Petitioner: Havana Docks Corporation.Respondent: Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., et al.
Advocates: Richard D. Klingler (for the Petitioner)
Aimee W. Brown (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Paul D. Clement (for the Respondents)
![[24-699] Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. (Cuba)](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-699] Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. (Cuba)
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. (Cuba)
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Feb 23, 2026.
Petitioner: Exxon Mobil Corporation.Respondent: Corporación Cimex, S.A. (Cuba), et al.
Advocates: Morgan L. Ratner (for the Petitioner)
Curtis E. Gannon (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Jules L. Lobel (for the Respondents)
Fact
![[25A312] Trump v. Cook](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25A312] Trump v. Cook
Trump v. Cook
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 21, 2026.
Petitioner: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.Respondent: Lisa D. Cook, Member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Advocates: D. John Sauer (for the Applicants)
Paul D. Clement (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
None
Question
N
![[24-1046] Wolford v. Lopez](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-1046] Wolford v. Lopez
Wolford v. Lopez
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 20, 2026.
Petitioner: Jason Wolford.Respondent: Anne E. Lopez, Attorney General of Hawaii.
Advocates: Alan A. Beck (for the Petitioners)
Sarah M. Harris (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Neal Kumar Katyal (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2023,
![[23-1209] M & K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[23-1209] M & K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund
M & K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 20, 2026.
Petitioner: M & K Employee Solutions, LLC.Respondent: Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund.
Advocates: Michael E. Kenneally, Jr. (for the Petitioners)
John E. Roberts (for the Respondent)
Kevin J. Barber (for the United States, as amicus c
![[24-1021] Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-1021] Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.
Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 14, 2026.
Petitioner: Cedric Galette.Respondent: New Jersey Transit Corporation.
Advocates: Michael Zuckerman (for New Jersey Transit Corp., et al. (Respondent in No. 24-1021, Petitioners in No. 24-1113))
Michael B. Kimberly (for Galette and Colt, et al. (Petitioner in 24-1021, Respondents i
![[24-38] Little v. Hecox](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-38] Little v. Hecox
Little v. Hecox
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 13, 2026.
Petitioner: Bradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al.Respondent: Lindsay Hecox, et al.
Advocates: Alan M. Hurst (for the Petitioners)
Hashim M. Mooppan (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Kathleen R. Hartnett (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
![[24-43] West Virginia v. B.P.J.](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-43] West Virginia v. B.P.J.
West Virginia v. B.P.J.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 13, 2026.
Petitioner: West Virginia, et al.Respondent: B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather Jackson.
Advocates: Michael R. Williams (for the Petitioners)
Hashim M. Mooppan (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Joshua A. Block (for the Respondent)
Facts of t
![[24-813] Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-813] Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana
Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 12, 2026.
Petitioner: Chevron USA Incorporated.Respondent: Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.
Advocates: Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioners)
Aaron Z. Roper (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
J. Benjamin Aguinaga (for the Respondents)
Facts of
![[24-872] Hamm v. Smith](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-872] Hamm v. Smith
Hamm v. Smith
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 10, 2025.
Petitioner: John Q. Hamm, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections.Respondent: Joseph Clifton Smith.
Advocates: Robert M. Overing (for the Petitioner)
Harry Graver (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Seth P. Waxman (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from o
![[24-345] FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd.](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-345] FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd.
FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 10, 2025.
Petitioner: FS Credit Opportunities Corp.Respondent: Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd.
Advocates: Shay Dvoretzky (for the Petitioners and BlackRock Respondents supporting the Petitioners)
Max E. Schulman (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting t
![[24-621] National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-621] National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission
National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 9, 2025.
Petitioner: National Republican Senatorial Committee.Respondent: Federal Election Commission.
Advocates: Noel J. Francisco (for the Petitioners)
Sarah M. Harris (for the Respondents, supporting the Petitioners)
Roman Martinez (Court-appointed amicu
![[25-332] Trump v. Slaughter](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[25-332] Trump v. Slaughter
Trump v. Slaughter
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 8, 2025.
Petitioner: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.Respondent: Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, et al.
Advocates: D. John Sauer (for the Petitioners)
Amit Agarwal (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Rebecca Kelly Slaughter was serving as a Commissioner on the Feder
![[24-993] Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-993] Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi
Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 3, 2025.
Petitioner: Gabriel Olivier.Respondent: City of Brandon, Mississippi, et al.
Advocates: Allyson N. Ho (for the Petitioner)
Ashley Robertson (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting vacatur)
G. Todd Butler (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
![[24-781] First Choice Women's Resource Centers, Inc. v. Platkin](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-781] First Choice Women's Resource Centers, Inc. v. Platkin
First Choice Women's Resource Centers, Inc. v. Platkin
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 2, 2025.
Petitioner: First Choice Women's Resource Centers, Inc.Respondent: Matthew J. Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey.
Advocates: Erin M. Hawley (for the Petitioner)
Vivek Suri (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Sundeep Iyer (for t
![[24-171] Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-171] Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment
Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 1, 2025.
Petitioner: Cox Communications, Inc.Respondent: Sony Music Entertainment.
Advocates: E. Joshua Rosenkranz (for the Petitioners)
Malcolm L. Stewart (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Paul D. Clement (for the Respondents)
Facts of
![[24-777] Urias-Orellana v. Bondi](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-777] Urias-Orellana v. Bondi
Urias-Orellana v. Bondi
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Dec 1, 2025.
Petitioner: Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana.Respondent: Pamela Bondi, Attorney General.
Advocates: Nicholas Rosellini (for the Petitioners)
Joshua Dos Santos (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana, a Salvadoran citizen, fled to the United S
![[24-556] Fernandez v. United States](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-556] Fernandez v. United States
Fernandez v. United States
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 12, 2025.
Petitioner: Joe Fernandez.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Benjamin Gruenstein (for the Petitioner)
Eric J. Feigin (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Joe Fernandez participated as a backup shooter in a 2000 murder-for-hire scheme in the Bronx. On F
![[24-820] Rutherford v. United States](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-820] Rutherford v. United States
Rutherford v. United States
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 12, 2025.
Petitioner: Daniel Rutherford.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: David C. Frederick (for the Petitioner in No. 24-820)
David A. O'Neil (for the Petitioner in No. 24-860)
Eric J. Feigin (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2003, twenty-two-year-old
![[23-1197] Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[23-1197] Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections
Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 10, 2025.
Petitioner: Damon Landor.Respondent: Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety.
Advocates: Zachary D. Tripp (for the Petitioner)
Libby A. Baird (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
J. Benjamin Aguinaga (for the Respondents)
F
![[24-758] The GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-758] The GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal
The GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 10, 2025.
Petitioner: The GEO Group, Inc.Respondent: Alejandro Menocal.
Advocates: Dominic E. Draye (for the Petitioner)
Jennifer D. Bennett (for the Respondents)
Sopan Joshi (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Alejandro M
![[24-1287] Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-1287] Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 5, 2025.
Petitioner: Learning Resources, Inc., et al.Respondent: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.
Advocates: D. John Sauer (for the federal parties)
Neal Kumar Katyal (for the private parties)
Benjamin Gutman (for the state parties)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
![[24-808] Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-808] Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton
Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 4, 2025.
Petitioner: Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc.Respondent: Jeanne Ann Burton.
Advocates: Daniel Ginzburg (for the Petitioner)
Lisa S. Blatt (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In November 2014, Vista-Pro Automotive, LLC, a Nashville-based
![[24-724] Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-724] Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist
Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 4, 2025.
Petitioner: The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., et al.Respondent: Sarah Palmquist, Individually and as Next Friend of E.P., a Minor.
Advocates: Sarah E. Harrington (for the Petitioners)
Russell S. Post (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Grant and Sarah Pa
![[24-1056] Rico v. United States](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-1056] Rico v. United States
Rico v. United States
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 3, 2025.
Petitioner: Isabel Rico.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Adam G. Unikowsky (for the Petitioner)
Joshua K. Handell (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In May 2018, Isabel Rico absconded from supervised release after serving only five months of her 42-month
![[24-924] Hencely v. Fluor Corporation](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-924] Hencely v. Fluor Corporation
Hencely v. Fluor Corporation
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 3, 2025.
Petitioner: Winston Tyler Hencely.Respondent: Fluor Corporation.
Advocates: Frank H. Chang (for the Petitioner)
Mark W. Mosier (for the Respondents)
Curtis E. Gannon (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2016, U.S.
![[24-109] Reargument: Louisiana v. Callais](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-109] Reargument: Louisiana v. Callais
Louisiana v. Callais (Reargument)
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 15, 2025.
Appellant: Louisiana.Appellee: Phillip Callais, et al.
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
This case involves a challenge to Louisiana’s congressional redistricting map, specifically focusing on District 6, alleging that the map is an impermissible racial gerrymander. The map was cre
![[24-624] Case v. Montana](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-624] Case v. Montana
Case v. Montana
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 15, 2025.
Petitioner: William Trevor Case.Respondent: State of Montana.
Advocates: Fred A. Rowley, Jr. (for the Petitioner)
Christian B. Corrigan (for the Respondent)
Zoe A. Jacoby (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In September 2021, Tr
![[24-5438] Bowe v. United States](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-5438] Bowe v. United States
Bowe v. United States
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 14, 2025.
Petitioner: Michael Bowe.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Andrew L. Adler (for the Petitioner)
Anthony A. Yang (for the Respondent)
Kasdin M. Mitchell (Court-appointed amicus curiae, supporting the judgment below as to Question 1)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2008,
![[24-482] Ellingburg v. United States](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-482] Ellingburg v. United States
Ellingburg v. United States
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 14, 2025.
Petitioner: Holsey Ellingburg, Jr.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Amy M. Saharia (for the Petitioner)
Ashley Robertson (for the Respondent, supporting vacatur)
John F. Bash (Court-appointed amicus curiae, supporting the judgment below)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
![[24-568] Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-568] Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections
Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 8, 2025.
Petitioner: Michael J. Bost.Respondent: Illinois State Board of Elections.
Advocates: Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioners)
Michael Talent (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Jane E. Notz (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.o
![[24-351] United States Postal Service v. Konan](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-351] United States Postal Service v. Konan
United States Postal Service v. Konan
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 8, 2025.
Petitioner: United States Postal Service.Respondent: Lebene Konan.
Advocates: Frederick Liu (for the Petitioners)
Easha Anand (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Lebene Konan, a Black property owner, leased two rental residences in Euless, Texas, and retr
![[24-539] Chiles v. Salazar](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-539] Chiles v. Salazar
Chiles v. Salazar
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 7, 2025.
Petitioner: Kaley Chiles.Respondent: Patty Salazar.
Advocates: James A. Campbell (for the Petitioner)
Hashim M. Mooppan (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Shannon W. Stevenson (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Kaley Chiles is a licensed p
![[24-5774] Barrett v. United States](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-5774] Barrett v. United States
Barrett v. United States
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 7, 2025.
Petitioner: Dwayne Barrett.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Matthew B. Larsen (for the Petitioner)
Aimee W. Brown (for the Respondent, in support of the Petitioner)
Charles L. McCloud (Court-appointed amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below)
Facts of the case (from o
![[24-440] Berk v. Choy](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-440] Berk v. Choy
Berk v. Choy
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 6, 2025.
Petitioner: Harold R. Berk.Respondent: Wilson C. Choy.
Advocates: Andrew T. Tutt (for the Petitioner)
Frederick R. Yarger (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Harold R. Berk injured his ankle and allegedly received negligent medical care from three healthcare providers: Dr. Wilso
![[24-557] Villarreal v. Texas](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-557] Villarreal v. Texas
Villarreal v. Texas
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Oct 6, 2025.
Petitioner: David Asa Villarreal.Respondent: State of Texas.
Advocates: Stuart Banner (for the Petitioner)
Andrew N. Warthen (for the Respondent)
Kevin J. Barber (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
David Asa Villarreal was ch
![[24A884] Trump v. CASA Inc.](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24A884] Trump v. CASA Inc.
Trump v. CASA Inc.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on May 15, 2025.
Petitioner: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.Respondent: CASA, Inc., et al.
Advocates: D. John Sauer (for the Applicants)
Jeremy M. Feigenbaum (for the State and City Respondents)
Kelsi B. Corkran (for the Private Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Q
![[24-394] Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-394] Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond
Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 30, 2025.
Petitioner: Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board.Respondent: Gentner Drummond, Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma.
Advocates: James A. Campbell (for the Petitioners in No. 24-394)
Michael H. McGinley (for the Petitioner in No. 24-396)
D.
![[24-362] Martin v. United States](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-362] Martin v. United States
Martin v. United States
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 29, 2025.
Petitioner: Curtrina Martin.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Patrick M. Jaicomo (for the Petitioners)
Frederick Liu (for the Respondents)
Christopher E. Mills (Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of the judgment below on Question 1)
Facts of the case
![[24-304] Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-304] Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 29, 2025.
Petitioner: Luke Davis.Respondent: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings.
Advocates: Noel J. Francisco (for the Petitioner)
Sopan Joshi (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party)
Deepak Gupta (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (
![[24-249] A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-249] A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279
A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 28, 2025.
Petitioner: A.J.T.Respondent: Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279.
Advocates: Roman Martinez (for the Petitioner)
Nicole F. Reaves (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Lisa S. Blatt (for the Respondent
![[24-320] Soto v. United States](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-320] Soto v. United States
Soto v. United States
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 28, 2025.
Petitioner: Simon A. Soto.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Tacy F. Flint (for the Petitioner)
Caroline A. Flynn (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Simon Soto, a Marine Corps veteran with a combat-related disability, was medically retired in 2006 with le
![[24-7] Diamond Alternative Energy LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-7] Diamond Alternative Energy LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency
Diamond Alternative Energy LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 23, 2025.
Petitioner: Diamond Alternative Energy LLC.Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency.
Advocates: Jeffrey B. Wall (for the Petitioners)
Edwin S. Kneedler (for the Federal Respondents)
Joshua A. Klein (for the State Respondents)
Facts of the case (f
![[24-297] Mahmoud v. Taylor](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-297] Mahmoud v. Taylor
Mahmoud v. Taylor
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 22, 2025.
Petitioner: Tamer Mahmoud.Respondent: Thomas W. Taylor.
Advocates: Eric S. Baxter (for the Petitioners)
Sarah M. Harris (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Alan E. Schoenfeld (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In Octobe
![[24-416] Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-416] Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 22, 2025.
Petitioner: Commissioner of Internal Revenue.Respondent: Jennifer Zuch.
Advocates: Erica L. Ross (for the Petitioner)
Shay Dvoretzky (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2010 and 2011, while still married, Jennifer Zuch and Patrick Gennardo made two
![[24-316] Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc.](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-316] Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc.
Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc.
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 21, 2025.
Petitioner: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of Health and Human Services.Respondent: Braidwood Management, Inc.
Advocates: Hashim M. Mooppan (for the Petitioners)
Jonathan F. Mitchell (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In 2010, Con
![[24-275] Parrish v. United States](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-275] Parrish v. United States
Parrish v. United States
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 21, 2025.
Petitioner: Donte Parrish.Respondent: United States of America.
Advocates: Amanda Rice (for the Petitioner)
Aimee W. Brown (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Michael R. Huston (Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of the judgment below)
Facts of the ca
![[23-1275] Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[23-1275] Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic
Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 2, 2025.
Petitioner: Eunice Medina, Interim Director, South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.Respondent: Planned Parenthood South Atlantic.
Advocates: John J. Bursch (for the Petitioner)
Kyle D. Hawkins (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitione
![[24-20] Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-20] Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization
Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Apr 1, 2025.
Petitioner: Miriam Fuld.Respondent: Palestine Liberation Organization.
Advocates: Kent A. Yalowitz (for the Petitioners in No. 24-20)
Edwin S. Kneedler (for the Petitioner in No. 24-151)
Mitchell R. Berger (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oye
![[24-154] Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-154] Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission
Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 31, 2025.
Petitioner: Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc.Respondent: Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission.
Advocates: Eric C. Rassbach (for the Petitioners)
Curtis E. Gannon (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
C
![[23-1345] Rivers v. Guerrero](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[23-1345] Rivers v. Guerrero
Rivers v. Guerrero
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 31, 2025.
Petitioner: Danny Richard Rivers.Respondent: Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.
Advocates: Peter A. Bruland (for the Petitioner)
Aaron L. Nielson (for the Respondent)
Matthew Guarnieri (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supportin
![[24-354] Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-354] Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research
Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 26, 2025.
Petitioner: Federal Communications Commission, et al.Respondent: Consumers' Research, et al.
Advocates: Sarah M. Harris (for the Petitioners in No. 24-354)
Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioners in No. 24-422)
R. Trent McCotter (for the Respondents)
Facts of t
![[23-1229] Environmental Protection Agency v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[23-1229] Environmental Protection Agency v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC
Environmental Protection Agency v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 25, 2025.
Petitioner: Environmental Protection Agency.Respondent: Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C., et al.
Advocates: Malcolm L. Stewart (for the Petitioner)
Seth P. Waxman (for Respondents Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association in support of the Peti
![[23-1067] Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[23-1067] Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency
Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 25, 2025.
Petitioner: Oklahoma, et al.Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Advocates: Mithun Mansinghani (for the Petitioners in No. 23-1067)
Misha Tseytlin (for the Petitioners in No. 23-1068)
Malcolm L. Stewart (for the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.or
![[24-109] Louisiana v. Callais](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[24-109] Louisiana v. Callais
Louisiana v. Callais
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 24, 2025.
Appellant: Louisiana.Appellee: Phillip Callais, et al.
Advocates: J. Benjamin Aguinaga (for the Appellant in No. 24-109)
Stuart C. Naifeh (for the Appellants in No. 24-110)
Edward D. Greim (for the Appellees)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
This case involves a challenge to Louisiana’s c
![[23-1270] Riley v. Bondi](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[23-1270] Riley v. Bondi
Riley v. Bondi
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 24, 2025.
Petitioner: Pierre Yassue Nashun Riley.Respondent: Pamela Bondi, Attorney General.
Advocates: Keith Bradley (for the Petitioner)
Ephraim McDowell (for the Respondent in support of the Petitioner)
Stephen J. Hammer (court-appointed amicus curiae in support of the judgment below)
Facts of the case (fr
![[23-1300] Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[23-1300] Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas
Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 5, 2025.
Petitioner: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.Respondent: Texas.
Advocates: Malcolm L. Stewart (for the Petitioners in No. 23-1300)
Brad Fagg (for the Petitioner in No. 23-1312)
David C. Frederick (for Respondent Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd.)
Aaron L. Nielson (for Respondents Texas,
![[23-1141] Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos](https://cdn.radoxo.com/images/podcasts/78561-supreme-court-oral-arguments.webp?v=1788155055)
[23-1141] Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Mar 4, 2025.
Petitioner: Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.Respondent: Estados Unidos Mexicanos.
Advocates: Noel J. Francisco (for the Petitioners)
Catherine E. Stetson (for the Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
The Mexican government sued sever
Recommended

پلی لیست | PlayList

Conspiracy Files with Paige Carter

Learn English A2 with Daily News | Simple English Listening Practice

Bible Tea

Bad Friends

Fantasy Flex

Solved Murders - True Crime Stories

紐約鳥|New York Aperture

Back to the 80s Radio

The Swerve Podcast: Obscure Topics | Conspiracy Theories

The Bread and Banter Podcast

The Church of What's Happening Now: The New Testament