Cryptocurrency Case Law Review
Cryptocurrency Case Law Review is a show aimed at legal professionals covering litigation involving cryptocurrency. Each episode walks through a recent court case that dealt with crypto evidence, explaining the arguments made and the issues the court considered. It draws on judgments from many jurisdictions to show how borderless crypto clashes with local law. Episodes address practical questions such as how expert crypto evidence is presented and challenged, the duty of care owed by VASPs in scams, whether stablecoins like USDT and USDC attract property rights, and what courts expect from tracing, clustering and attribution methods. The format is concise case briefs meant to keep litigators current.
Episodes
Trailer - Cryptocurrency Case Law Review
When cryptocurrency evidence enters the courtroom, the side that controls the technical narrative wins.
Cryptocurrency evidence means dealing with untested technology, millions of dollars on the line, and a legal environment being rewritten in real-time.
Welcome to the Cryptocurrency Case Law Review the podcast for legal professionals engaged in cryptocurrency litigation.
Law is practiced lo
Can a 'Click-Wrap' Warning Discharge a VASP's Duty of Care?
How can a VASP prove it did "enough" to prevent a user from falling victim to a scam?
This episode examines Xu v. NDAX Canada, a case in which expert evidence and internal risk metrics helped a VASP avoid an adverse judgment. We explore the "four-stage warning protocol" and discuss why a court described a plaintiff as the "author of her own misfortune."
For litigation partners managing risk, a
Why Did the First Full Crypto-Fraud Trial in the UK Ultimately Fail? (The D’Aloia Series: Part 1)
The D’Aloia v. Persons Unknown judgment in the UK High Court is too significant for a single episode.
Today, we begin a four-part exploration of the UK High Court’s first full trial involving a crypto-fraud claim. We start by examining the court’s findings in bridging the gap between equity and code, ruling that USDT attracts property rights. However, we also introduce the evidentiary threshol
Scrutinising Cryptocurrency Tracing Evidence in the UK High Court (D’Aloia Part 2)
In this episode, the second chapter of the D'Aloia series, focusing on the evidentiary threshold required to prove funds reached a specific destination. Learn how a "subjective" tracing narrative led to a total dismissal and how to ensure your expert’s methodology is defensible under scrutiny.
The Case
Case Name: Fabrizio D'Aloia v Persons Unknown Category A and Others
Neutral Citation: [2024] EW
Recommended
Crickets Corner
History of the Earthquake and Fire in San Francisco
Fox news
K-Drama Obsessed Mamas | Beyond “Just One More Episode!”
True Crime Classics
The Healer Revolution
Becoming: HER with Nikki Spoelstra
Booked, Blonde & Busy w/ Olivia Ponton
McKinsey on Consumer and Retail
megahired.com
Hard Knocks Podcast
Effective Weight Loss for Moms | High protein, Strength Training, Lose Weight, Meal Planning, Fat Loss, Healthy Habits
